|
|
Post by Glen on May 15, 2009 14:19:20 GMT 10
Out June. Chaosy goodness!  |
|
|
|
Post by masterdecoy on May 20, 2009 1:10:47 GMT 10
wow, for somthing called "the temple of skulls" this would have to contain the least amout of skulls from any GW terrain peice.
Unless the fantasy range works different to 40k.
|
|
|
|
Post by Glen on May 20, 2009 17:45:15 GMT 10
well calling it the Temple of Steps because there's more step than skulls wouldnt have the same effect.
actually, now that i think of it lotsa steps would be more effective than an angry looking skull. - "do we have to climb all the way to the top!"
|
|
|
|
Post by masterdecoy on May 21, 2009 9:59:44 GMT 10
everyone loves a slinky.....
|
|
vx485
Full Member
Posts: 162
|
Post by vx485 on Jun 26, 2009 22:48:33 GMT 10
or maybe you could call it 'temple with a few giant skulls'
|
|
|
|
Post by DecipleofLorgar on Jun 30, 2009 2:02:23 GMT 10
Hahahahaha vx485, very nice. But a few things wrong with all the suggestions you guys have made.... where is the temple? looks more like steps, a ruined floor beloning to what could have been a temple type structure, and some skulls that look more like they were carved for the building.
Guess names like "ruined building that may or may not have been a temple" doesn't really capture what it is intended to be used for.
|
|
|
|
Post by Igginator on Jul 8, 2009 20:40:49 GMT 10
Its more like an empty shrine or summoning place.
|
|
delta13
Junior Member
The Warmaster
Posts: 80
|
Post by delta13 on Jul 9, 2009 2:08:46 GMT 10
how about " the ruind bugoda of evilness"
|
|
